Relates to extreme risk protection orders; defines "exception"; authorizes a police officer or district attorney to file an application for an extreme risk protection order if found that a person meets the requirements of an exception pursuant to section 6340 of the civil practice law and rules; makes related provisions.
Not law yet. Pending legislation.
Official status checked 2026-10-21 23:46 PT
NY Senate (Martinez)
Bill summary
Relates to extreme risk protection orders; defines "exception"; authorizes a police officer or district attorney to file an application for an extreme risk protection order if found that a person meets the requirements of an exception pursuant to section 6340 of the civil practice law and rules; makes related provisions.
Now vs if chaptered
NOW: reported to Codes; not law. IF CHAPTERED: individual officers/DAs can (and in the 'shall file' path must) petition ERPOs against respondents 12+, on a substantial-risk standard.
Defender utility
NY PDs on ERPO calendars: if this chapters, the fight is standing (individual cop/DA vs agency), the 12-year-old respondent floor, and whether 'credible information' actually showed substantial risk. Not a new CPW. Not a California GVRO; portable as an ERPO-petitioner-expansion analogue next to AB 1753.
Who this is for. NY PDs on ERPO calendars — pending individual-officer/DA petitioner expansion and age-12 respondent floor, not present law; not a California GVRO.
Bank hints
- ERPO